A Push for Transparency
Posted June 26 2009
Yesterday, two South Jersey Assembly Members introduced a
bill that would require that proposed legislation be made public for at least
one business day before Assembly committees can vote on it.
According
to the Atlantic City Press, Assemblymen Vince Polistina (R-Egg
Harbor Township) and John Amodeo (R-Margate), both of whom represent the 2nd
Legislative District believe the legislation is necessary "because legislators
frequently are asked to vote on bills that are not publicly available and
[that] legislators have not fully read."
As a case in point, Polistina noted a few recent cases in
which, upon reaching Trenton, legislators received bills that the public had
never had a chance to review. Echoing this sentiment, Amodeo noted in a press
release, "This is a fitting time to introduce this legislation because in
recent years the Legislature has voted on budgets that were still warm from the
printer.. That practice is not fair to citizens and only leads to bad
government."
Indeed, the budget is not the only area of concern.
With our state facing issues as critical as marriage, the
sanctity of life, parental notification laws, education policies, taxes,
protection against sexual predators - and the list goes on - it's disturbing to
realize bills affecting any of these or myriad other issues may come up for a
committee vote before the public even has the opportunity to see them. Even
worse, it's unconscionable to think our legislators may vote on bills
addressing these issues before fully reviewing them themselves! Could you
imagine a same-sex "marriage" bill that would radically redefine marriage being
pushed forward in this manner?
This is all-too-common fare in Washington, and we regularly
hear of votes taken before Congressional Members or their staffs have had time
to read through the legislations. And all-too-often, this leads to situations
of unintended consequences in which legislators pass laws with unrelated
"attachments," the content of which they are completely unaware!
While the volume of legislation that passes before our
state's legislators hardly equals that which passes before our nation's Congress,
the principle remains the same: legislators have a responsibility to understand
what they are voting on, and the public has a right to know what bills are up
for consideration by our state's governing body.
The Press article reports that Assemblymen
Polistina's and Amodeo's "bill would amend Assembly rules to forbid votes on
any bill, including resolutions, amendments and substitutions, unless they have
been available for one full business day." And while committees would have the
authority to "waive the rule with a unanimous vote," by and large, this bill
would enhance the opportunity for public input into - and at the very least
knowledge of - legislation that might soon become the law of the state.
As the fight continues to enact family-friendly legislation
and block bills that would be harmful to marriage and the family, legislative
transparency will take on a heightened importance.
While the text of the bill (AR212) was not released prior to
this Musings, we support the reported effort to increase awareness of pending
legislative actions.
Archive