Lame-Duck Issue Has
Legs!
Posted August 28, 2009
A recent NJ.com
headline
read "N.J. activists from both sides prepare for gay marriage bill
debate." NBC40.net heralded the
header
,
"Same Sex Marriage Advocates Prepare for Fight." And
SmartBrief.com
captioned
its blurb, "Garden State could be next marriage battleground."
Wherever you look and
whatever news outlet you frequent, the message in the same: the
battle for marriage in New Jersey is intensifying like never before.
With the legislature expected to debate "marriage equality"
during the upcoming Lame Duck session — the period after the
November elections and before the start of the new legislative
session in January — it could just be a few short months before the
definition of marriage is decided.
Disturbingly, if events
follow this course, marriage — the foundational institution of
society for millennia — will be defined by a group of 120 elected
officials, with the voice of the people virtually silenced in the
decision.
There is a reason
legislators have pinpointed the Lame Duck session to debate this
critical issue: traditionally, during Lame Duck, people's
attentions are focused elsewhere. They've just been through a
campaign season rife with television, radio, internet, newspaper, and
mail ads, and with Thanksgiving and Christmas right around the
corner, few want to spend time thinking about politics. Anti-marriage
crusaders intend to capitalize on this to stealthily push through a
bill that will fundamentally alter the foundation of our society and
pave the way for the legal recognition of even more radical
relationships in the future.
Mark my words, when the
only criteria for labeling something "marriage" is that two
people "love each other" and are in a "committed"
relationship, no barrier exists to granting the status of marriage to
any form of relationship, be it triad, man-boy, etc. Some will call
this statement absurd, but simple logic says otherwise. When no
standard exists, anything goes.
By choosing the Lame
Duck session to take up the marriage issue, many legislators hope to
avoid having the issue impact their own re-election efforts this fall
as well as the gubernatorial election. Afraid to face the truth that
citizens actually about marriage — and care enough to have it
affect their vote — legislators hope to pass the measure quietly
and without backlash after the election, when public eyes are, by and
large, looking elsewhere.
Friends, the truth is
that many legislators are afraid of the people whom they represent —
afraid the voice of the people will derail their agenda to push
same-sex marriage. If this were not the case, they would willingly
place the measure on the ballot and let the people decide — as some
30 other states have already done, with the result in every
case being that
the people voted to preserve the definition of
marriage as
between one man and one woman
.
But there is hope. The
end in New Jersey is not a foregone conclusion. We have been
traversing the state meeting with hundreds of concerned citizens who
are stepping out and taking a stand. For some, this is their first
foray into "politics," but they recognize they cannot sit on the
sidelines with such a critical and historic issue at stake.
Time is short; there is
much to do, but we can win this battle to preserve the time-honored
institution of marriage.
We invite you to be a
part of this historic effort. Contact us at 1-800-653-7204 to learn
how you can make a difference today.
Archive