Toll and Tax Scare … and the Upcoming Budget Season
Posted February 5, 2010
New Jersey motorists had a scare recently. It wasn't an auto
collision, or a weather-related catastrophe, or even a new construction project
that jammed up rush hour.
No, it was a recommendation by Governor Chris Christie's
transition team that the state look into "limited tolling of select interstate
highways to pay for improvements to those highways." In other words, a
recommendation that non-toll roads become toll roads in New Jersey.
According to the Asbury
Park Press, "Transportation experts said the most likely candidates for
tolling would be east-west interstates I-78, I-80 and I-195, along with other
high-volume highways such as I-287 and I-295."
Beyond this, the report from the transition team suggested
letting New Jersey voters choose whether or not to up the state's gas tax
(we're pretty sure voters would select "not"!).
Were it not serious, such a recommendation would almost be
laughable, given the vigor with which New Jersey voters opposed a similar
proposal by former Governor Jon Corzine. You'll recall Corzine's attempt to
hike tolls fell flat.
Fortunately, the transition team's recommendations have done
the same. Speaking this week at a news conference, Governor Christie said he
would not accept the toll and tax recommendations.
NJ.com
reports the governor's wish to give his transition team "wide latitude" in
considering options but notes his response to the recommendations: "I don't
favor tolls on roads where we don't currently have them, and I do not favor and
will not sign an increase in the gas tax. When people are struggling -- that is
not the time to raise taxes and fees."
We applaud Governor Christie's refusal to accept his team's
recommendations. At the same time, we hope his opposition to new tolls and
higher taxes continues even when people are no longer struggling economically.
Of course, Christie's refusal to cave to the toll and tax
temptation means solving this year's budget problems will be that much more
difficult in the short term. The latest numbers now place the budget deficit for
next year at over $11 billion and the current budget gap at over $1 billion.
According to a new Monmouth
University/Gannett New Jersey Poll, however, not all spending cuts would be
met with applause. The press release on the poll notes:
With a yawning gap in the state
budget, the only way property taxes will come down is through cuts to
government spending, especially in the area of education, which is the prime
driver of property taxes. And here, the poll gives Governor Christie a major
caveat. While 51% of Garden State residents would be very upset with the
governor if he doesn't reduce state spending during his term, even more – 62% –
would be very upset if school funding was cut. …
The poll also found that 54% of New
Jerseyans would be very upset if programs for the poor
were cut and 42% would be very upset
if environmental regulations were relaxed.
The
Monmouth University Polling Institute notes that at the end of the day,
however, New Jerseyans want results:
The most important issue for voters
during last year's gubernatorial campaign was taxes,
especially property taxes. New
Jerseyans continue to see this as a defining issue by which they will judge the
success of a Christie administration.
The next several months of budgeting are bound to bring
recommendations from all sides. Some proposals will be good; some will not be.
As Governor Christie rejected the recommendation to hike tolls and taxes on New
Jerseyans, we urge him to reject any similar attempts that may come down the
pike to impose additional burdens on overtaxed New Jerseyans.
Spending cuts may be painful and unpopular, but they are
also necessary to solve the fiscal crisis that has held New Jersey taxpayers
hostage for far too long.
Archive