In their quest to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples, same-sex activists would have us believe that marriage is just a civil matter. Yet marriage is far more than a civil matter, as approximately eighty percent of couples solemnize their marriages with clergy.  Marriage is a sacred religious and personal matter that affects the lives, happiness, and health of the men, women and children involved.  Heterosexual marriage, as clearly illustrated by social science evidence, provides the best environment to raise children and yields the healthiest relationships on average. In conjunction, research shows that strong religious beliefs increase marital success, health, and happiness.

Marriage is actually a human institution that involves both church and state, which is why civil and religious marriage can not be completely separated from one another. Religion lends the critical support needed to sustain the marriage culture on which the whole society depends and the state is interested in what marriage provides: a social structure that secures a stable family.  Same-sex relationships in contrast have proven remarkably unstable and fragile in nature – ending in divorce significantly more than heterosexuals.  Broken families lead to crime, poverty, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, school failure, mental and physical health problems – all requiring millions of government dollars.
 
While same-sex activists argue marriage is simply a civil matter they have, at the same time, attacked the church for strongly defending one-man one-woman marriage, and have even attempted to re-write church history regarding marriage.  The Judeo-Christian traditions and other major world religions make it very clear that God created male and female and instituted the union of one-man and one-woman from the beginning of time. In spite of this, some scholars claim that same-sex unions have been practiced and accepted by various peoples through out history, including by the church in premodern Europe!  Professors Lubin and Duncan respond to these unsupportable hypotheses in a 1998 Catholic Law review article by stating that the so-called evidence for same-sex marriage comes from small, isolated, pre-literate tribes and conclude that “There is no rich history of same-sex ‘marriage’”, [and] the ‘resistance’ to same-sex marriage is not limited to Western culture, ”but extends to almost every culture throughout the world.“ Regarding the imagination of church history by a few homosexual activists, their hypotheses stem from taking Greek words clearly describing brotherhood and bonding rituals and falsely and outrageously eroticizing them – despite the precision of the Greek language.  

Because the civil and religious nature of marriage is so intertwined, the church and the state must each do their part to support a stable marriage culture.  The church can do its part to help society and the state by stepping up activities to encourage stable marriages, and the state can do its part to help society and the church by passing a state constitutional marriage amendment to preserve the definition of marriage between one man and one-woman only. Like all laws, marriage law is legitimately discriminatory in order to civilize society for the benefit and health of all, not for the desires of the few at the expense of the rest. Every citizen has equal rights, yet we must remember that there is an important context to those rights in the US Constitution:  “we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights”.  President John F. Kennedy recognized this foundational principle in his inaugural address stating, ”The same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue...the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.  We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution."  Marriage is indeed both a civil and religious matter, and with respect to same-sex “marriage” there has never been a civil or God-given right to it.            

Word Count 629

Remember, our legislators are not required to check their religious beliefs at the door of Statehouse and those who think they should are ignorant of the Christian principles upon which the success of our whole government structure rests as clearly stated by the Founders.

History of Marriage?  - FRC – Slippery Slope of SS-Marr. “Gay Marriage: A No Show in History”.  ALSO: Gay Marriage: Reimagining Church History.

No society lasts that does not preserve the pre-eminence of marriage between one man and one woman.

back to Editorials